Rating Scale for the Work File

Drafts

Weekly Progress Report

Deadlines

Interviews and Discussions

Decisions

Source Material included

Group Work

Self Reflection

5

5

5

5

5

5

Contains all the drafts of the final work All the drafts were handed  in to the teacher.

Contains weekly progress reports

handed in to the teacher.

Contains summaries of all discussions, decision making and interviews throughout the project.

Used various sources. Used the internet. Contains summaries of sources or the original.

Group members worked consistently on the task in the classroom. All of the group members had a role and were involved at all stages of the project.

Contains reflections of each member of the group throughout the project. It has at least 5 such reflections.

3-4

3-4

3-4

3-4

3-4

3-4

Contains only some of the drafts of the final work. These were all handed in to the teacher.

Contains most of the weekly progress reports with the teacher's comments.

Contains some summaries of discussions , decision making and interviews.

Only one or two sources used. The internet was used. Summaries or original sources appear in the work file.

Shows evidence of group work. Most of the members worked.

Contains only 3 reflections from each individual member of the group.

1-2

1-2

1-2

1-2

1-2

1-2

Contains very few drafts. Most of the drafts were not handed in to the teacher

Contains a few of the weekly progress reports. Some of the reports have the teacher's comments

Contains very few summaries of decisions, discussions and interviews.

Internet not used. Contains only one source.

Summary of the material taken from the source.

Not all the members worked.

Contains only 2 reflections.

Rating Scale for the Written File

Length

Organization

Topic

Accuracy

10

10

10

10

The final written work contains 7-10 pages

The written work is organized and contains all of the following requirements.

1.a cover page with the name of the topic, the topic question, the names of the members and the teacher's name

2.a table of contents

3.an introduction of the topic

4.at least 3 relevant paragraphs

5.a conclusion

6. a bibliography (of sources used and of all the internet sites)

7.Appendix ( this may include pictures and/or drawings)

8. The final work is typed with double spacing. The size of the letters is 12.

The final work is written in a clear and organized way.

1.There is a  topic question.

2.The paragraphs are connected to the topic question.

3.The conclusion answers the topic question.

The written work has been checked and rechecked for spelling and grammar mistakes. There are no mistakes.

6-8

6-8

6-8

6-8

The final written work

contains 5-6 pages

The written work contains number 1 and 8 and 4 more of the above requirements.

The final work is written in an organized way. It contains at least 2 of the above.

The final work has very few spelling and grammar mistakes.

3-5

3-5

3-5

3-5

The final written work contains 3-4 pages

The written work contains number 1 and 8 plus 2 more of the above requirements.

The final work contains only 1 of the above.

The final work has many spelling and grammar mistakes.

Rating Scale for the Oral Presentation

Group Performance

Topic

Content

Length

Accuracy

Creativity

5

5

5

5

5

5

Participation of all the members of the group. Tasks were divided equally.

Well prepared. Everyone knows their part.

Group members show expertise on the subject and can answer questions on it.

Content is informative and interesting. The topic question is stated and conclusions are given.

10 minutes

Each member of the group speaks fluently and makes very few mistakes in grammar. Uses difficult words correctly.

Use of visuals, or other aids. Shows originality.

3-4

3-4

3-4

3-4

3-4

3-4

Tasks were not divided equally.

Not well prepared.

Almost everyone knows their part.

Group members show some expertise.

Content is quite informative and interesting. The topic question is stated but no conclusion is given.

6 - 8 minutes

Some of the speakers make many mistakes but speak fluently.

Some use of aids. Some evidence of originality.

1-2

1-2

1-2

1-2

1-2

1-2

No cooperation. Only 1 or 2 members participated. Members don't know their parts.

Group members cannot answer all of the questions on the subject.

Content is not informative and topic question is not stated. No conclusion is made.

Less than 5 minutes

Many grammar mistakes and lack of fluency by some of the members of the group.

No use of aids.